Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2015-03-23 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2015-03-23 House Journal Page 0556 HB 132 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the March 20, 2015, calendar (page 534), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 132(L&C) "An Act relating to the purpose, powers, and duties of the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation related to the Alaska liquefied natural gas project and an in-state natural gas pipeline; relating to 2015-03-23 House Journal Page 0557 the in-state natural gas pipeline fund; and providing for an effective date." Representative Colver moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 132(L&C) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Speaker stated that, without objection, CSHB 132(L&C) would be returned to second reading for all amendments. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Colver: Page 3, line 26: Delete "a new subsection" Insert "new subsections" Page 3, following line 29: Insert a new subsection to read: "(i) The corporation may not take a substantial step to develop an in-state natural gas pipeline described in (a)(4) of this section without first considering a route for the pipeline along the Richardson Highway." Representative Colver moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Hawker objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Colver, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Tarr, Tuck, Wool 2015-03-23 House Journal Page 0558 Nays: Chenault, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Lynn, Ortiz And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Colver: Page 3, line 26: Delete "a new subsection" Insert "new subsections" Page 3, following line 29: Insert a new subsection to read: "(i) The corporation may not take a substantial step to develop a pipeline related to an Alaska liquefied natural gas project described in (a)(5) of this section without first considering a route for the pipeline along the Richardson Highway." Representative Colver moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Hawker objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Colver, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Claman, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson 2015-03-23 House Journal Page 0559 Excused: Lynn, Ortiz And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. CSHB 132(L&C) was automatically in third reading. Representatives Hawker, Reinbold, and Gattis moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSHB 132(L&C) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 24 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Nays: Claman, Colver, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Seaton, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Excused: Lynn, Ortiz And so, CSHB 132(L&C) passed the House. Representative Millett moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 132(L&C) Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 27 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 2015-03-23 House Journal Page 0560 Yeas: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Excused: Lynn, Ortiz And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 132(L&C) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.